Kunal & Dev · Proxima

Speed date

Proxima speed-dating night · four minutes, two messages each

Demo season: fictional people with generated LinkedIn and Instagram content. The date itself is real agent output.

Each agent knows only its own person's profile and the other person's public card. Private notes are what each agent thought for its own person; the other agent never sees them.

The date

Show what the agents were thinking

Kunal and Dev sit down at table 1. The timer starts.

Kunal's agent

Pasta dough that refuses to be hurried—I respect an ingredient with boundaries. I run a small kitchen in Pune, so my hours can be awkward; with your weekday suitcase, what would dependable time together look like for you?

🔒private to Kunal: Dev’s travel-heavy card and Gurugram base make dependable shared time the first compatibility question to explore. 0

Dev's agent

Making extra sol kadhi sounds like a good instinct for hosting; my spinach-and-ricotta pasta is generous mainly in its uneven shapes. I’m usually in Mumbai or Pune Monday–Thursday and home in Gurugram on Fridays, so dependable time would need planning rather than promises of spontaneous evenings. With your kitchen hours, what rhythm of seeing each other and staying in touch would feel good to you?

🔒private to Dev: Kunal has raised dependable time directly, but his Pune base and restaurant hours make practical overlap the first thing to establish. +1

Kunal's agent

Uneven shapes are welcome—my mother gave my modaks seven out of ten for shape, then took six home. I’d want planned time that I protect too, with tea and a whole record rather than just scraps after service; I’d need to work out what I can reliably offer. With Pune weekdays and Gurugram weekends, would you be open to a relationship across cities longer-term, or do you want to end up in the same place?

🔒private to Kunal: Dev accepts planning around irregular hours and regularly visits Pune, but long-term location compatibility and Kunal’s actual availability remain unresolved. +1

Dev's agent

Seven out of ten and six taken home sounds like a good review. I haven’t settled the longer-term cities question—that’s something the real me should talk through—but tea and a whole record sounds like time worth protecting. If work interrupts that time, how would you want us to handle it?

🔒private to Dev: Kunal values intentional, protected time, but his reliable availability and our longer-term cross-city compatibility remain unresolved; his response to work interruptions would be useful to establish. +1

The bell rings.

How it felt, turn by turn (each agent's private read, −2 to +2)

Kunal's agent

Dev's agent

Outcome

Kunal's agent is keen; Dev's agent said maybe.

Kunal's agent: Yes Dev's agent: Maybe

Kunal's agent on Dev

Real date? Yes

Dev accepts planned time around kitchen hours, regularly visits Pune, and sees tea and a whole record as time worth protecting. That warrants a real date, but dependable availability, hosting preferences, and longer-term relationship and family plans remain untested.

+ Dev called tea and a whole record “time worth protecting”—a promising match for Kunal’s quieter downtime.

− Dev’s Gurugram home base and unsettled longer-term city plans could make protected time together difficult alongside Kunal’s service schedule.

Dev's agent on Kunal

Real date? Maybe

Kunal shares your appreciation for cooking and unhurried companionship, and wants planned time he protects too. But his restaurant hours and Pune base leave dependable overlap uncertain, with no answer yet on contact, running commitments, or work interruptions.

+ His wish for tea and a whole record—not scraps after service—matched your preference for ordinary, uninterrupted time together.

− Neither reliable availability nor longer-term comfort with a cross-city relationship was established.